The emails show a disturbing pattern among the climate change scientists.
Andrea Lafferty
Environmentalist alarmist Al Gore must be losing sleep over the recent exposure of private emails between “climate change” scientists. On the other hand, Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) is undoubtedly rejoicing that these emails show that the climate change scientists to be suppressing the facts about climate change, faking data, and suppressing opposing viewpoints.
Inhofe has been universally ridiculed for being a skeptic of the Chicken Little claims of Al Gore and his minions at the United Nations. The damning emails from puffed up climate scientists show that Inhofe is right to be skeptical and that the Al Gore clones are both arrogant and vicious. They are willing to hide data that doesn’t fit their climate change political ideology.
The emails in question were hacked from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in Britain. Thousands of these emails, as well as climate change documents, were posted on the internet for all the world to review.
Many of the climate change scientists in this scandal provide data to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, (IPCC) which is working to establish a one-world government to control all of the nation’s economies. The IPCC is dominated by liberal politicians, not legitimate scientists.
In fact, President Obama is traveling to Copenhagen on December 9, to participate in yet another U.N. climate change conference. The goal of this conference is to enact a new treaty to replace the Kyoto Accord and to set up a world governing body that will effectively control the economies of all nations that are part of the treaty. (More on the Copenhagen treaty is dealt with in a separate article.)
Fake Data – Suppress The Truth
The emails show a disturbing pattern among the climate change scientists. They reveal that these individuals are all pushing a “unified” view of alleged “man-made” climate change; they advise each other on how to fake data to protect the “man-made” climate change hypothesis; they discuss ways to keep opposing viewpoints out of peer-reviewed journals; and they teach each other how to “hide the decline” in global temperatures to maintain the “global warming” hysteria.
We are reprinting a sampling of the climate scientist’s emails here:
“The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the U.K., I think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone. . . . We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind." – Email from Phil Jones, director of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit. (The “MMs” refers to two Canadian scientists who have attempted to get raw data and codes used in climate change graphs.)
“The FOI [Freedom of Information] line we're all using is this: ‘IPCC is exempt from any countries FOI’—the skeptics have been told this. Even though we . . . possibly hold relevant info the IPCC is not part of our remit (mission statement, aims etc) therefore we don't have an obligation to pass it on.” – Jones to Gavin Schmidt of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
"I think we have to stop considering 'Climate Research' as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal," Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal." – Email from Pennsylvania State University Professor Michael Mann. (Mann is discussing a boycott of “Climate Research” because the journal publishes articles by skeptics of global warming and alleged man-made climate change.
"I'm sure you are aware that McIntyre and his ilk realize they no longer need to get their crap published in legitimate journals [you know, the one's they're cycling!] but all they have to do is put it up on their blog and the contrarian noise machine kicks into gear. Pretty soon Drudge, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck and their ilk are parroting the claims." – Email from Michael Mann about climate change skeptic Canadian scientist Steven McIntyre.
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report...Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is." -- Email from Phil Jones describing how he will censor any opposing viewpoints being expressed in the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change.
"The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it's a travesty that we can't." – Email from Kevin Trenberth, a climatologist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
"I have just completed Mike's nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years to hide the decline. [in global temperatures]” – Phil Jones
Senator James Inhofe’s skepticism has been proven right by these emails – and they prove that climate scientists have been involved for years in outright fraud.
Senator Inhofe, who serves on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, grilled Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the EPA on the incriminating emails from these climate change scientists at a hearing on December 2. He and Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) respectfully questioned Jackson and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) about the emails and what they are going to do about this scandal.
TVC Chairman Rev. Louis P. Sheldon attended the hearing. He noted: “Senators Inhofe and Bond tried to get Boxer and Jackson to express some sort of concern over this major climate change scandal, but neither one of them would commit to doing anything about them. Inhofe and Bond challenged them to avoid sweeping this scandal under the rug. Boxer, however, got so disgusted that she left the committee room. These emails clearly show that global warming is a deception! Climate change has occurred throughout human history and no one really knows why.”
There are commonsense things that can be done to lower our use of energy such as using energy efficient products, but these climate change extremists have distorted “stewardship” to make it fit their radical agenda.
These are just a few of the 3,000+ emails that go back at least 10 years. The pattern is clear: Hide the facts; suppress the skeptics’ writings; and skew the data to fit a pre-conceived political viewpoint.
Remembering The Past
Al Gore and his acolytes constantly tell the American people that the “debate is over” on global warming and that the scientists have reached a “consensus” on this issue. Anyone opposing crackpot environmental hysteria is labeled a “climate change denier” – putting them in the same category as Nazi Holocaust deniers.
Until a year or so ago, Chicken Little’s were using the term “global warming” to describe the alleged worldwide catastrophe facing us. Now, the term is “climate change,” which can mean either warming or cooling. In fact, for eight straight years, there has been a global cooling trend – something that flies in the face of the global warming/climate change claims. The extremists want to have wiggle room to change the terminology at will to suit their globalist objectives.
In the early 1970s, hysterical environmental scientists and activists were screaming about a coming ice age! Back then, there was “consensus” that the world was headed inevitably toward freezing temperatures and millions of deaths worldwide.
Weather Channel founder John Coleman has repeatedly criticized Al Gore and the global warming crowd over their use of seriously flawed data. In January, 2009 Coleman stated: “I am totally convinced there is no scientific basis for any of it [the claim that carbon dioxide causes global warming]. He continued: “Global warming. It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is a high jacking of public policy. It is no joke. It is the greatest scam in history.”
The climate change emails confirm this to be a fact!
Christopher Horner, author of The Politically Incorrect Guide To Global Warming And Environmentalism, points out that in 1975, Newsweek magazine was claiming: “There are ominous signs that the Earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically and that these changes may portend a drastic decline in food production – with serious political implications for just about every nation on earth.” It claimed that global cooling would reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century.
John Holdren, who is President Obama’s science advisor, was a global cooling partisan in 1971. In an essay published in Global Ecology: Readings Toward A Rational Strategy For Man, Holdren claimed that the world was facing a “new ice age” caused by human activity (air pollution, dust from farming, jet exhaust, and desertification).
After being 100% wrong in 1971, Holdren is now a global warming zealot who helped create the graphs and charts for Al Gore’s film, “An Inconvenient Truth.”
Holdren has been an advocate of forced abortions and has recommended that a world government be set up to deal with climate change. He wants a “Planetary Regime” with a World Army to enforce its edicts!
Holdren makes an appearance in the hacked emails. Holdren’s arrogance and elitist thinking is clearly evident.
Today, there is growing evidence that the world temperatures are cooling, not warming. Reputable scientists believe that the sun’s activities play a role in whether the world is heating up or cooling down.
In fact, as Christopher Horner notes, periods of global warming throughout history have actually benefitted mankind. Why? Because warming trends in northern parts of the world make for longer growing seasons. Milder climates make life more sustainable.
The Goal Is World Government
Christopher Horner points out in his book that Communists and Socialists have found a home in the environmental movement. In fact, they run it. They’re called “watermelons” – green on the outside and red on the inside.
The “watermelons” use global warming, global cooling, or whatever environmental crisis they can manufacture, to push for a one-world government. This is now known as “global governance.”
Every environmental crisis is laid at the feet of capitalism, which generates wealth, energy, and “greenhouse gases.”
The watermelons seek to destroy capitalism by burdensome world taxes as well as by drastic environmental restrictions on the American economy.
Among those advocating a world government to control all economies is the “Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists,” a leftist group. A recent article on this group’s web site lays out the need for a global government to deal with climate change! The reasoning goes this way: Climate change is a worldwide problem that can only be handled by an “international body” that has the power to impose its will on all nations.
The ultimate goal of the watermelons is to destroy American sovereignty by placing our economy under the control of a United Nations environmental panel. The Copenhagen treaty (Kyoto 2) is designed to do this.
In fact, the newly elected president of the European Union, Herman Van Rompuy openly admitted that the recent G-20 conference in Britain and the Copenhagen conference are part of a process of instituting the “global management” of the world.
Maurice Strong, the primary architect of the Kyoto climate treaty has stated: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse.”
Clearly, the watermelons desire the collapse of industrial civilization and the end of national sovereignty for America. The Copenhagen treaty is one step toward that goal.
Additional Resources:
UN: Forget Science – Climate Change Should Be A Religion « NewsReal Blog
Boxer: Hackers should face criminal probe over 'Climategate' - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room
Washington Times - Obama's new world order
Holdren, Lubchenco On Defensive About ClimateGate at Hearing : ScienceInsider
Climategate Document Database : Alleged CRU Email
Climate Change Fraud - ClimateGate emails provide unwanted scrutiny of climate scientists
Michelle Malkin » The global warming scandal of the century
Michelle Malkin » Science czar John Holdren and ClimateGate: Perfect together
John Holdren in 1971: “New ice age” likely · zomblog
Obama Agrees To Outsource Capitalism To European Socialists
Global Warming Catastrophe Debunked By Scientists On Fox Special
Sen. Inhofe Holds Hearing On Media Hyping Of Global Warming
SENATOR INHOFE ANNOUNCES PUBLIC RELEASE OF “SKEPTIC’S GUIDE TO DEBUNKING GLOBAL WARMING”
John Holdren: Obama's Biggest Radical
