Showing posts with label Green. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Green. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

The Greening of Osama bin Laden

by Jim Kouri
 
It seems that the king of terrorists, Osama bin Laden, and President Barack Obama and his supporters share more than just a hatred for U.S. military power: They are all "greenies."
 
The leader of al-Qaeda -- much like U.S.leftists -- blames the United States and developed nations for not halting climate change and said that the global economy should immediately abandon its reliance on the American dollar.
 
An audiotape, purported to be the voice of the world's most infamous terrorist, was broadcast on al-Jazeera TV. In it, bin Laden exhorts the world to boycott of the US dollar "to free humankind from slavery."
 
"I don't know whether to laugh or cry," said former police detective Sid Frances. "Here's the most wanted man in the world practically parroting the talking points of the Washington elite and news media regarding environmental issues. America is evil. America is a polluter. America enslaves people. Is it Osama's or the Democrat Party's talking points?"
 
This latest tape comes only a few days after another tape, also purported to be from Bin Laden was released in order to praise the terrorist for the attempted bombing of a Northwest airliner landing at Detroit International Airport on Christmas Day.
 
"All industrial nations, mainly the big ones, are responsible for the crisis of global warming," the latest tape says. "This is a message to the whole world about those who are causing climate change, whether deliberately or not, and what we should do about that."
 
Osama uses the usual vitriol in his criticism of former US President George W Bush and blames Bush for his refusal to sign on to the Kyoto Protocol to combat global warming, now called climate change.
 
In the tape, Osama allegedly calls on the world's countries to boycott the US dollar. "I know that there would be huge repercussions for that, but this would be the only way to free humankind from slavery to America and its companies."
 
"The folks at MoveOn.org and other 'progressive' organizations seem to have found a soulmate who hates Bush as mush as they do. It's quite fascinating," said Det. Frances.
 
Osama, in his first tape of the New Year released last week, praised the efforts of a Nigerian terrorist in his attempt to kill more than 275 people onboard a Northwest airliner on December 25.
 
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was reportedly arrested and interrogated by federal law enforcement investigators when Northwest Flight 253 landed at Detroit International Airport on Christmas Day after he allegedly tried to detonate a makeshift bomb he surreptitiously took through airport security in Nigeria and Amsterdam. Abdulmutallab presently is being held in a secure prison about 50 miles outside of Detroit.
 
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a columnist for The Examiner (examiner.com) and New Media Alliance (thenma.org). In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty.
 
He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com. Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.
Read more >>

Friday, January 22, 2010

THE GROWING FELONY AGAINST LIFE ON EARTH: HUMAN OVERPOPULATION

By Frosty Wooldridge
 
Part 1: Human felony of giving food aid without contraceptive aid
 
As a college freshman, my residence hall opted to forego Sunday meals to give money to the 90 million starving souls in Bangladesh. We felt good because we fed millions of famished children. However, no one understood the downside: we fed an already overpopulated country that grew to 144 million people. What’s wrong with that? Answer: they live in a landmass the size of Iowa. They expect to double their population by mid century.
 
What felony did we commit? We gave food aid without contraceptive aid. Thus, they face greater human tragedy as their population exploded like a human atomic bomb. They live in utter squalor and degradation unknown in the Western world, except for Haiti!
 
Ironically, Haiti suffers not only from an earthquake, but at nine million on its way to 12 million living on a spit of an island, that civilization faces horrific consequences at every level. They cut down 98 percent of their trees. They drain 36 million tons of topsoil into the ocean annually—thus lack arable land to feed their humongous population. They pump billions of gallons of toxic sewage directly into the ocean. They suffer unimaginable illiteracy rates. They grow their population beyond their ability to maintain a sustainable and livable civilization.
 
In a brilliant article by British population expert Eric Rimmer, “Compounding the Felony”, rmcd@optimumpopulation.org, he speaks to the least addressed issue in the world today. We must wonder why world leaders, the media and most countries avoid the overpopulation issue at all costs. In the meantime, humans add another billion to the planet every 13 years with no end in sight! Yet, the symptoms erupt daily around the globe. Rimmer brings the issue front and center:
 
“Ever since we moved from nomadic hunter-gathering to settled farming - we have been able to produce enough food to expand our population,” said Rimmer. “As early populations swelled, we outgrew one area, then moved to another – or moved from one island to the next – and extracted all we could from millennia of accumulated bio-capacity, often leaving land that would take many centuries to recover.
 
“The only real brakes on our expansion were famine, disease (often transferred from the animals we had “domesticated”) territorial, religious conflict and adverse climate-change - which together resulted in high death rates and brutally short lives.
 
“It took most of the last ten millennia for us to learn to overcome enough of those limitations by introducing much higher levels of hygiene, developing new medicines and other ways of dealing with disease and injury and – to reap the benefits in terms of greater longevity and, of course, accelerating population growth.”
 
THE WORLD SCALE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FELONIES
 
“This was accomplished in the face of more and more of us killing each other in massive conflicts,” said Rimmer. “Yet the inevitable Malthusian difference between geometric people growth and arithmetic growth in food supplies has now led to global population that has tripled in seventy years – and is fair set to add 50 percent to current totals by mid-century. Imagine the additional conflicts that will produce!
 
“That growth has been almost totally dependent on fossil fuels, not only to provide the traction and fertilizers for modern farming, but also to transport food over increasingly ridiculous distances. Cheap fossil fuels are now ending, and will either price themselves beyond common use and/or simply come to a practical end as the cost of extraction becomes prohibitive.
 
“And if we could find clean and sustainable energy sources to replace fossil fuels – which seems increasingly unlikely – what would that achieve? Isn’t it likely that we would just continue our current profligacy, and destroy yet more of our planet’s natural infrastructure?
 
“Although we developed effective contraception 50 years ago, it has not been available to, or utilized by, large numbers of people in many parts of the world – where local population doubling is occurring in periods of 20 or 30 years. And in the “developed” world, we each increase our riches and gobble up more and more of limited world resources.
 
“One result has been the fact that, since the mid 1980’s, our total consumption has exceeded overall bio-capacity - and the excess consumption is now above 30 percent. Not only must we now reduce current population and individual consumption to enable sustainability – it is blindingly obvious that another 50 percent population increase can only lead to disaster. Moreover, if everyone were to be living in the style of the European Union — a lifestyle that many aspire to — consumption would now exceed bio-capacity by 140 percent.”
 
KEEP THE FOLONY GOING FOR HUMAN MISERY
 
“Nevertheless we go on compounding the felony,” said Rimmer. “We make increasingly frantic efforts to increase food supplies, but much less determined efforts to increase contraceptive use, and we therefore drive population growth on an expanding scale. We think we are being compassionate by rescuing millions from starvation while ignoring their burgeoning numbers, but we are simply condemning a much larger number of people to the same fate.
 
“In giving aid without requiring receiving governments to make contraceptives readily available and promote smaller families, we are aiding and abetting a crime of monstrous proportions.
 
“One outstanding example is Ethiopia, where Bob Geldorf marshaled an impressive array of pop musicians in 1984-85 to raise millions for food aid. Unfortunately, though Ethiopian population was then 41 million – it is now 82 million – and is racing ahead to 148 million by 2050. And another famine looms on the horizon.
 
“Another example is Afghanistan. We agonize about our aims there - and the terrible sacrifice of so many of our young people – yet we pay little attention to a birth-rate which will increase the current population of 28 million two and a half times to 74 million by 2050. Who believes that Afghanistan will be at all manageable by then?
 
“Our need to avoid giving aid to nations which are failing to make a significant effort to constrain their population growth is an even more difficult subject than population growth in general, yet if we do nothing, we should admit, at least to ourselves, that we are acting to compound the degree of misery that is to come.
 
“One difficulty in any attempt to spread this unpalatable truth is that neither we, nor the USA, are taking adequate steps to stop our own populations expanding.”
 
As Rimmer said, “We need to get this dilemma firmly on to the discussion agenda.” To that, I add, today, now, this minute, not a second later. Why? Because humans add another 220,000 people every day and 77 million annually. It’s not like we have a lot of time to play with this monster bearing down on us.
 
Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents – from the Arctic to the South Pole – as well as six times across the USA, coast to coast and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle, Norway to Athens, Greece. He presents “The Coming Population Crisis in America: and what you can do about it” to civic clubs, church groups, high schools and colleges. He works to bring about sensible world population balance at www.frostywooldridge.com He is the author of: America on the Brink: The Next Added 100 Million Americans. Copies available: 1 888 280 7715
 
 
Read more >>

Friday, January 8, 2010

Poor Al Gore

By Andrea Lafferty

Imagine building your whole career upon the boogieman of "global warming" and then finding out that it's been based on falsified and suppressed information on climate change?

Poor Al Gore must be sweating it out over the Climategate emails and documents posted on the internet in November 2009 – just weeks before the Copenhagen climate change conference.

Gore canceled a speech he was to give in Copenhagen on his Chicken Little beliefs about climate change. The cancellation came after the Climategate emails went viral around the globe.

The Climategate emails and documents are from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in the UK. The CRU is the primary source of data on climate change used by Al Gore, the United Nations, every nation, and climate change activists.

The Climategate emails prove that scientists have been systematically faking or suppressing the fact that climate temperatures have been dropping for the past decade – and that temperatures were far warmer in Europe more than a thousand years ago. (It is known as the Medieval Warm Period and lasted from 1000-1300. This was followed by the Little Ice Age.)

Gore doesn't like to answer tough questions from credible climate change skeptics. He prefers to appear on Conan O'Brien, Jay Leno or David Letterman to hit softball questions from his groupies. Even on these shows, he gets his facts wrong. He was on O'Brien's show before Christmas and told the audience that the earth's core is millions of degrees. Wrong: It's 5,000 degrees.

Al Gore has a history of exaggerating the facts or getting them totally wrong. He won an Oscar for his slide-show, which became a movie called "An Inconvenient Truth." Yet, this movie is rife with factual errors and misinterpretations of statistics.

Lord Christopher Monckton, former science advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, is currently traveling the world with his own slide show that debunks Gore's global warming misinformation.

Lord Monckton has also written a detailed analysis of the Climategate scandal which is posted on the ScienceandPublicPolicy.org web site. "Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!" lays out the facts about the significance of these emails to the climate change debate.

Weather Channel founder John Coleman has repeatedly criticized Al Gore and the global warming crowd over their use of seriously flawed data. In January, 2009 Coleman stated: "I am totally convinced there is no scientific basis for any of it [the claim that carbon dioxide causes global warming]. He continued: "Global warming. It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is a high jacking of public policy. It is no joke. It is the greatest scam in history."

Why Are These Emails Important?

The significance of these Climategate emails cannot be underestimated. The United Nations, national leaders, and political leaders in Washington, D.C., use climate change data from the Climate Research Unit to craft legislation and treaties that will impact the economic well-being of every nation on earth.

If the climate change statistics are false, then any decision based on these statistics will be flawed and dangerous to the economic future of the nations of the world.

The United Nations and President Obama were pushing for passage of a treaty on climate change, which would require drastic reductions in greenhouse gases in America and other nations. In addition, the House of Representatives is pushing for passage of a cap and trade bill that will devastate our economy. The treaty and cap and trade bill are based upon false statistics and should be rejected by Congress.

Christopher Horner, an analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, wrote an important book debunking global warming hysteria back in 2006. His book, The Politically Incorrect Guide To Global Warming (And Environmentalism) carefully exposed the global warming scam. His work has been totally confirmed by the exposure of the Climategate emails.

Horner's work is an essential book for anyone who wants to understand what the real goals are of the global warming activists. A hint: The goal is world governance (the current euphemism for world government run by the United Nations).

Where Is Reliable Information?

Climate Change activists have been successful for decades in controlling the debate over global warming and the environment, but the Climategate emails have changed the debate and have undermined this monopoly on information about climate change.

Al Gore loves to say that "the debate is over" on global warming, but clearly it is not. The debate had been controlled by scientists who suppressed facts, shredded documents, vilified critics of global warming, and dominated the peer review process in scientific publications. Their monopoly has ended. Let a real debate begin with honest scientists.

American legislators should immediately stop any attempts to pass legislation based on falsified scientific data on climate change. Every statistic from the CRU in East Anglia is now suspect. Nothing coming from the CRU can be believed as true as a result of this Climategate email scandal.

Where does the average American go for reliable information on global warming or climate change? Here's a short list TVC has compiled:

Read more >>

Monday, November 2, 2009

NYT: GORE'S BIG PROFITS FROM 'GLOBAL WARMING'...

Gore’s Dual Role in Spotlight: Advocate and Investor

By JOHN M. BRODER

Former Vice President Al Gore thought he had spotted a winner last year when a small California firm sought financing for an energy-saving technology from the venture capital firm where Mr. Gore is a partner.

The company, Silver Spring Networks, produces hardware and software to make the electricity grid more efficient. It came to Mr. Gore’s firm, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, one of Silicon Valley’s top venture capital providers, looking for $75 million to expand its partnerships with utilities seeking to install millions of so-called smart meters in homes and businesses.

Mr. Gore and his partners decided to back the company, and in gratitude Silver Spring retained him and John Doerr, another Kleiner Perkins partner, as unpaid corporate advisers.

The deal appeared to pay off in a big way last week, when the Energy Department announced $3.4 billion in smart grid grants. Of the total, more than $560 million went to utilities with which Silver Spring has contracts. Kleiner Perkins and its partners, including Mr. Gore, could recoup their investment many times over in coming years.

Silver Spring Networks is a foot soldier in the global green energy revolution Mr. Gore hopes to lead. Few people have been as vocal about the urgency of global warming and the need to reinvent the way the world produces and consumes energy. And few have put as much money behind their advocacy as Mr. Gore and are as well positioned to profit from this green transformation, if and when it comes.

Critics, mostly on the political right and among global warming skeptics, say Mr. Gore is poised to become the world’s first “carbon billionaire,” profiteering from government policies he supports that would direct billions of dollars to the business ventures he has invested in.

Representative Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, asserted at a hearing this year that Mr. Gore stood to benefit personally from the energy and climate policies he was urging Congress to adopt.

Mr. Gore says that he is simply putting his money where his mouth is.

“Do you think there is something wrong with being active in business in this country?” Mr. Gore said. “I am proud of it. I am proud of it.”

In an e-mail message this week, he said his investment activities were consistent with his public advocacy over decades.

“I have advocated policies to promote renewable energy and accelerate reductions in global warming pollution for decades, including all of the time I was in public service,” Mr. Gore wrote. “As a private citizen, I have continued to advocate the same policies. Even though the vast majority of my business career has been in areas that do not involve renewable energy or global warming pollution reductions, I absolutely believe in investing in ways that are consistent with my values and beliefs. I encourage others to invest in the same way.”

Mr. Gore has invested a significant portion of the tens of millions of dollars he has earned since leaving government in 2001 in a broad array of environmentally friendly energy and technology business ventures, like carbon trading markets, solar cells and waterless urinals.

He has also given away millions more to finance the nonprofit he founded, the Alliance for Climate Protection, and to another group, the Climate Project, which trains people to present the slide show that was the basis of his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” Royalties from his new book on climate change, “Our Choice,” printed on 100 percent recycled paper, will go to the alliance, an aide said.

Other public figures, like Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have vocally supported government financing of energy-saving technologies, have investments in alternative energy ventures. Some scientists and policy advocates also promote energy policies that personally enrich them.

As a private citizen, Mr. Gore does not have to disclose his income or assets, as he did in his years in Congress and the White House. When he left government in early 2001, he listed assets of less than $2 million, including homes in suburban Washington and in Tennessee.

Since then, his net worth has skyrocketed, helped by timely investments in Apple and Google, profits from books and his movie, and scores of speeches for which he can be paid more than $100,000, although he often speaks at no charge.

He is a founder of Generation Investment Management, based in London and run by David Blood, a former head of Goldman Sachs Asset Management (the firm was quickly dubbed Blood and Gore). Mr. Gore earns a partner’s salary at Kleiner Perkins. He has substantial personal finances invested at both firms, officials of the companies said.

He also serves as an adviser to high-profile technology companies including Apple and Google, relationships that have paid him handsome dividends over the last eight years.

Mr. Gore’s spokeswoman would not give a figure for his current net worth, but the scale of his wealth is evident in a single investment of $35 million in Capricorn Investment Group, a private equity fund started by his friend Jeffrey Skoll, the first president of eBay.

Ion Yadigaroglu, a co-founder of Capricorn, said that Mr. Gore does not sit on the fund’s investment committee, but obviously agrees with the partners’ strategy of putting long-term money into promising ventures in energy, technology and health care around the globe.

“Aspirationally,” said Mr. Yadigaroglu, who holds a doctorate from Stanford in astrophysics, “we’re trying to make more money than others doing the same thing and do it in a way that is superior in ethics and impacts.”

Mr. Gore has said he invested in partnerships and funds that try to identify and support companies that are advancing cutting-edge green technologies and are paving the way toward a low-carbon economy.

He has a stake in the world’s pre-eminent carbon credit trading market and in an array of companies in bio-fuels, sustainable fish farming, electric vehicles and solar power.

Capricorn holds a major stake in Falcon Waterfree Technologies, the world’s leading maker of waterless urinals. Generation has holdings in Ausra, a solar energy company based in California, and Camco, a British firm that develops carbon dioxide emissions reduction projects. Kleiner Perkins has a green ventures fund with nearly $1 billion invested in renewable energy and efficiency concerns.

Mr. Gore also has substantial interests in technology, media and biotechnology ventures that have no direct tie to his environmental advocacy, an aide said.

Mr. Gore is not a lobbyist, and he has never asked Congress or the administration for an earmark or policy decision that would directly benefit one of his investments. But he has been a tireless advocate for policies that would move the country away from the use of coal and oil, and he has begun a $300 million campaign to end the use of fossil fuels in electricity production in 10 years.

But Marc Morano, a climate change skeptic who until recently was a top aide to Senator James M. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma, said that what he saw as Mr. Gore’s alarmism and occasional exaggerations distorted the debate and also served his personal financial interests.

Mr. Gore has testified numerous times in support of legislation to address climate change and to revamp the nation’s energy policies.

He appeared before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in April to support an energy and climate change bill that was intended to reduce global warming emissions through a cap-and-trade program for major polluting industries.

Mr. Gore, who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his climate advocacy, is generally received on Capitol Hill as something of an oracle, at least by Democrats.

But at the hearing in April, he was challenged by Ms. Blackburn, who echoed some of the criticism of Mr. Gore that has swirled in conservative blogs and radio talk shows. She noted that Mr. Gore is a partner at Kleiner Perkins, which has hundreds of millions of dollars invested in firms that could benefit from any legislation that limits carbon dioxide emissions.

“I believe that the transition to a green economy is good for our economy and good for all of us, and I have invested in it,” Mr. Gore said, adding that he had put “every penny” he has made from his investments into the Alliance for Climate Protection.

“And, Congresswoman,” he added, “if you believe that the reason I have been working on this issue for 30 years is because of greed, you don’t know me.”

Read more >>

Thursday, October 15, 2009

There’s a Chill in the Air

By E. Ralph Hostetter    

Is global warming over?  Let's take a peek at what's been happening around the world in the past year.

Michael Asher of DAILY TECH reports, "Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded.  China has its coldest winter in 100 years.  Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history.  North America has the most snow cover in 50 years, with places like Wisconsin the highest since record keeping began.  Record levels of Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia, Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile and the list goes on and on.  All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) all show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously."

The DAILY TECH report continues: "The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.656 up to 0.75 degrees C. — a value large enough to wipe out all the warming recorded over the past 100 years.  It's the fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down."

The NEW YORK POST headline reads:  "July 8 storm brings snow to city just north of Gotham."  That same day the high temperature at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago was 65 degrees, Chicago's coldest July 8 since 1891, while in Melbourne, Australia, temperatures have remained 10 degrees below normal.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Earth System Research Laboratory in Mauna Loa, Hawaii, has measured carbon dioxide for the past 50 years.  In December 1958, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere was 314.67 parts per million.  In December 1998 at about the time global cooling reappeared, CO2 had increased to 366.87 ppm.  By December 2008, CO2 had advanced to 385.54 ppm, a 5.088% growth in just one decade.  CO2 concentration continues to rise.

That increase has benefits for the planet.  Crop yields are increasing.  The planet is greener.

However, as a measurement of world temperatures rise and fall, it may not have the effects that have been predicted.

Looking at the record, NOAA in its State of the Climate Report for 2008 observed, ". . . since the end of the 1970s, the average surface temperature has warmed 1 degree F.; the earth's surface is currently warming at a rate of about 0.29 degree F. per decade or 2.9 degrees F. per century; the warmest year being 1934.”

According to Tony Pann, BALTIMORE WEATHER EXAMINER, "The planet stopped warming in 1998 and has shown distinct cooling this decade."

D. Bruce Merrifield, writing for the AMERICAN THINKER, observed:  "Solar activity is now believed to have the greatest influence on climate change as global temperatures rise and fall. Solar activity is measured in cycles.

"Cycles include the 100,000 year cycle, a 41,000-year cycle, a 23-year cycle and an 11-year sun spot cycle wherein solar radiation increases and then declines.  Superimposed on the latest 100,000 year peak have been six secondary warming periods, and each has been coincident with massive surges of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, vastly greater than the amounts currently being generated by burning fossil fuels.

"Each of these previous warming periods was warmer than the current warming period, and current temperatures are below the median for the last 3000 years."

Merrifield continues:  "Most remarkably, civilization first emerged in the Tigris, Euphrates and Nile River Valleys about 3400 B.C. in that period of great warming, and even more remarkably, each of these secondary surges of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses (none of human origin), has also been coincident with the rise of a major civilization."

It was during this period that agriculture was invented.

"Interestingly, starting about two decades ago (1988), the total increase of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere has abruptly stopped, in spite of increased burning of fossil fuels."

The Babylonian Era emerged 3,000 years ago in the 1000 B.C. warming period.  After a period of 500 years, the Greek civilization appeared.  Next the Romans arrived some 400 years later.  A 1,000-year cold period followed, leading into the dark ages.  Crop failures caused mass starvation and freezing cold killed millions more.

If, in fact, America is entering a cold period, global warming will be remembered with the thought that warmer is better, regardless of all the "envirocrat" threats of drought, famine, storms and tornadoes.

E. Ralph Hostetter, a prominent businessman and publisher, also is an award-winning columnist and Vice Chairman of the Free Congress Foundation Board of Directors.

Read more >>

Europen GREEN energy: Burn BUNNIES!

Will Obama Follow and set up similar here under his GREEN ENERGY plans with Europes new BIOENERGY ideas?

Stockholm's bunnies burned to keep Swedes warm

By David Landes

The bodies of thousands of rabbits culled every year from the parks in Stockholm’s Kungsholmen neighbourhood are being used to fuel a heating plant in central Sweden.

The decision to use Stockholm’s rabbit cadavers as bioenergy to warm Swedes living in Värmland doesn't sit well with Stockholm-based animal rights activists.

“Those who support the culling of rabbits surely think it’s good to use the bodies for a good cause. But it feels like they’re trying to turn the animals into an industry rather than look at the main problem,” Anna Johannesson of Vilda kaniners värn (‘Society for the Protection of Wild Rabbits’) told the local Vårt Kungsholmen newspaper.

Every year, the city of Stockholm kills off thousands of rabbits in an effort to protect trees and shrubbery in the city’s extensive network of parks and green space.

According to Tommy Tuvunger with the Stockholm Traffic Office, the agency responsible for controlling the city’s rodent and wild animal population, part of the problem rests with delinquent pet owners who decide to release their rabbits into the city’s parks.

“Many of the released rabbits are tame,” he told the newspaper.

Animal control authorities employ a special rifle to shoot the excess rabbits, with most of the culling taking place at dawn when the animals peek out from their holes.

The city usually steps up its rabbit hunting efforts in the autumn as leaves begin to fall from bushes and trees, making it easier to see the rabbits.

Tuvunger explained that it doesn’t take many newly released rabbits to do what rabbits are known for doing, much to the detriment of Stockholm’s efforts to control the size of its rabbit population.

“People who think that the bunnies are cute and cuddly suddenly don’t think they’re as fun anymore and put the animals outside. They think: ‘there they can play with the other rabbits’,” he said.

Last year marked a new record for Stockholm’s rabbit cull, with nearly 6,000 rabbits, mostly from Kungsholmen, being removed from Stockholm’s parks.

But rather than simply disposing of the dead rabbits, the city instead froze them for eventual transport to a special heating plant in Karlskoga in central Sweden, where the bunny bodies are then burned as a form of bioenergy.

According to Johannesson, Sweden’s animal control authorities aren’t interested in pursuing other options besides killing the rabbits.

“We want to see them start looking at other solutions for the rabbits,” she said, citing the Finnish capital of Helsinki, which employs sprays to make park plants unappetizing as well as a network of shelters for various domesticated animals.

“In Helsinki, where they have the same problem, they’ve come much farther,” Johannesson told Vårt Kungsholmen.

Read more >>

Saturday, October 10, 2009

BBC: What happened to global warming?

By Paul Hudson
Planet Earth (Nasa) Average temperatures have not increased for over a decade

This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.

So what on Earth is going on?

Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming.

They argue that there are natural cycles, over which we have no control, that dictate how warm the planet is. But what is the evidence for this?

During the last few decades of the 20th Century, our planet did warm quickly.

The Sun (BBC) Recent research has ruled out solar influences on temperature increases

Sceptics argue that the warming we observed was down to the energy from the Sun increasing. After all 98% of the Earth's warmth comes from the Sun.

But research conducted two years ago, and published by the Royal Society, seemed to rule out solar influences.

The scientists' main approach was simple: to look at solar output and cosmic ray intensity over the last 30-40 years, and compare those trends with the graph for global average surface temperature.

And the results were clear. "Warming in the last 20 to 40 years can't have been caused by solar activity," said Dr Piers Forster from Leeds University, a leading contributor to this year's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

But one solar scientist Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction, a company specialising in long range weather forecasting, disagrees.

He claims that solar charged particles impact us far more than is currently accepted, so much so he says that they are almost entirely responsible for what happens to global temperatures.

He is so excited by what he has discovered that he plans to tell the international scientific community at a conference in London at the end of the month.

If proved correct, this could revolutionise the whole subject.

Ocean cycles

What is really interesting at the moment is what is happening to our oceans. They are the Earth's great heat stores.

Pacific ocean (BBC) In the last few years [the Pacific Ocean] has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down

According to research conducted by Professor Don Easterbrook from Western Washington University last November, the oceans and global temperatures are correlated.

The oceans, he says, have a cycle in which they warm and cool cyclically. The most important one is the Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO).

For much of the 1980s and 1990s, it was in a positive cycle, that means warmer than average. And observations have revealed that global temperatures were warm too.

But in the last few years it has been losing its warmth and has recently started to cool down.

These cycles in the past have lasted for nearly 30 years.

So could global temperatures follow? The global cooling from 1945 to 1977 coincided with one of these cold Pacific cycles.

Professor Easterbrook says: "The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling."

So what does it all mean? Climate change sceptics argue that this is evidence that they have been right all along.

They say there are so many other natural causes for warming and cooling, that even if man is warming the planet, it is a small part compared with nature.

But those scientists who are equally passionate about man's influence on global warming argue that their science is solid.

The UK Met Office's Hadley Centre, responsible for future climate predictions, says it incorporates solar variation and ocean cycles into its climate models, and that they are nothing new.

In fact, the centre says they are just two of the whole host of known factors that influence global temperatures - all of which are accounted for by its models.

In addition, say Met Office scientists, temperatures have never increased in a straight line, and there will always be periods of slower warming, or even temporary cooling.

What is crucial, they say, is the long-term trend in global temperatures. And that, according to the Met office data, is clearly up.

To confuse the issue even further, last month Mojib Latif, a member of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) says that we may indeed be in a period of cooling worldwide temperatures that could last another 10-20 years.

Iceberg melting (BBC)
The UK Met Office says that warming is set to resume

Professor Latif is based at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University in Germany and is one of the world's top climate modellers.

But he makes it clear that he has not become a sceptic; he believes that this cooling will be temporary, before the overwhelming force of man-made global warming reasserts itself.

So what can we expect in the next few years?

Both sides have very different forecasts. The Met Office says that warming is set to resume quickly and strongly.

It predicts that from 2010 to 2015 at least half the years will be hotter than the current hottest year on record (1998).

Sceptics disagree. They insist it is unlikely that temperatures will reach the dizzy heights of 1998 until 2030 at the earliest. It is possible, they say, that because of ocean and solar cycles a period of global cooling is more likely.

One thing is for sure. It seems the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over. Indeed some would say it is hotting up.

Read more >>

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Little Fish, Big Problem

By E. Ralph Hostetter

An environmental battle is under way today in California between the farmers
of the San Joaquin Valley and Delta areas and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. The issue at hand is the possibility of a future major drought in
the area and the effect such a drought would have on the survival of an
endangered species known as the Delta Smelt, a three and one-half inch
minnow.

Pacific Legal Foundation's "Save Our Water, Save Our Jobs" petition campaign
has been joined by California key civic, business and agricultural leaders.
The petition campaign has gathered 12,000 signatures to date, urging
President Barack Obama and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to
convene a special panel called the "God Squad" to address California's water
emergency caused by harsh federal environmental restrictions. The "God
Squad" is a panel of seven cabinet officials acting as a committee to
intercede in economic emergencies.

California Governor Schwarzenegger refuses to invoke the "God Squad"
provision, giving the reason that in the five times it has been attempted,
it failed in four. Appeals to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
brought the same result - a refusal.

The San Joaquin farmers find themselves in a political stalemate.
Environmentalists represented by the Fish and Wildlife Commission are
holding fast for the most part, though in the past month substantial relief
was granted when some 600,000 acre-feet of water were released to the most
needy farmers in the region.

The San Joaquin River is not a strong river. It has been known to go dry at
times, partly as a result of a dam built on the river in 1949.
San Joaquin farmers might be well advised to take a page from the Klamath
River Basin Farmers to the north. Farmers along the southern
Oregon-northern California border in the Klamath River Valley faced a
similar problem when irrigation to the farms in the region was shut down
eight years ago in 2001 on orders from Secretary of the Interior Gale
Norton.

Environmentalists had petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to deny
irrigation water to the farmers in the Klamath River Basin in order to
protect an endangered species of fish known as the Lost River or Short Nose
(snubnose) sucker.

The Klamath River, approximately 263 miles long, is a major river along the
southern Oregon and California border considered prime habitat for Chinook
salmon, Coho salmon and Steelhead trout, none of which is an endangered
species.

When the use of water in the Upper Klamath Basin for irrigated agriculture
was temporarily cut off in 2001, hundreds of thousands of acres in the
Klamath Valley went without irrigation that summer. A wave of civil
disobedience swept the valley as hundreds of local farmers using saws and
blow torches seized the head gates of the Klamath Lake to feed water into
irrigation canals on three occasions in June and July. Bureau of
Reclamation officials closed them again, then turned to federal marshals and
the FBI to help them keep the gates closed after the local sheriff refused
to intervene. As tensions grew in Klamath Valley, Secretary Gale Norton
finally ordered the gates to open permanently in 2002.

The Endangered Species Act of 1973 expired in 1990 but funding has been
continued by Congressional environmentalist bureaucrats far beyond what the
sponsors of the original act ever intended. The original intent of the law
was to protect the American bald eagle, the grizzly bear and bison, true
icons in the natural animal world in America. It was never intended to
include insects, rodents and reptiles that have appeared on the list of
endangered species by the hundreds.

The reach of the Endangered Species Act today has been extended into areas
of private property rights that are proving disastrous in their application
to local citizens.

For example, the Atlanta, Georgia, region in 2007 was suffering a similar
problem - one of the worst droughts in its history. Over 3 million people
in the Atlanta area depend on the 38,000-acre Lake Lanier for their water.
Lake Lanier was then estimated to have less than a 90-day supply of water,
controlled by the U.S. Corps of Engineers at a normal water flow of some
5,000 cubic feet per second (CFS). Atlanta pleaded with the Corps of
Engineers to reduce the flow somewhat to protect its water supply. After
passing numerous communities and two power plants, all of which require
necessary amounts of water, the flow reaches the "three biggest road blocks
to dropping the rate of flow." Apparently taking precedence over all else,
the biggest roadblocks - not the humans in Atlanta - are the "Fat
three-ridge mussel, purple bank climber mussel and the Gulf sturgeon, a
fish." All three are "endangered species and carry a federal mandate that
the water release rate be maintained, otherwise the mussels will die."

There is something inherently wrong about placing the rights of rodents,
aquatic life and insects above the Constitutionally guaranteed right to life
and property of citizens of the United States.

E. Ralph Hostetter, a prominent businessman and publisher, also is an
award-winning columnist and Vice Chairman of the Free Congress Foundation
Board of Directors. He welcomes e-mail comments at
eralphhostetter@yahoo.com.

Read more >>