Friday, April 6, 2012


...If it weren't so destructive to the nation.
Although I'm prepared for almost anything coming out of this administration, every now and then, they surprise me. Their minions on the media, have almost more gall than the president and his entourage.(!)
Look for example at NBC's Brian Williams accusing  a Federal Judge of "bringing politics into the Court Room by questioning Obama."
Brian Williams shows a "sudden loss of memory" when he omits the undeniable fact, that it was Barry Soetoro, not the judge, who brought politics (I mean, Chicago politics) into the court room, by saying:
" I am confident the Supreme Court will not overturn the health care law when it issues a ruling later this year on the constitutionality of the legislation, it would be "unprecedented" for the court to make such a dramatic power play over Congress."

"I am confident that this will be upheld because it should be upheld," Mr. Obama told reporters at the White House when asked about the case at press availability after meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon."
Mr. Obama said a decision by the nation's top court to throw out the law would be unprecedented and precisely the kind of action that many conservatives for years have criticized as overreaching "judicial activism."
"Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a "democratically" elected Congress," Mr. Obama said in the Rose Garden appearance. The quotation marks on the word democratically, are mine. Just a flash-back to Al Frank's election.
First of all, the usurper-in-chief, with all his high education, doesn't have a clue of what judicial activism is; overturning a law passed by Congress is NOT judicial activism. Creating a law by usurping the authority of the true law makers, IS judicial activism.
When I saw the above on T.V., somehow the words sounded like: "Rocco, Rocco, you'r like a son to me. Whatsa you shu number, just in case" (Marlon Brando special voice needed)!
To the best of my recollection, no president before, had dared make a "veiled" threat to the Judiciary, as they understood it to be a separate branch of government. Barry Soetoro has, not only tainted the presidency and made a mockery of the U.S.A. abroad, he's showing the undeniable signs of wanting to follow on Hitler's steps and become the tyrant he truly is in his mind. Knowing his definite dislike for Judaism, I would be very worried if I were one myself.
Second of all, the law might have been passed by a "strong majority of a democratically elected Congress", but I remind the readers of the wise and intelligent words of the second less sharp knife in the drawer, dear Nancy: "you have to pass it before we can find what's in it"
I fail to see how a law can be passed anywhere, when probably none of the voting members, had any idea of what they were voting on! In the words of a known Congressman, "you need a bunch of lawyers to understand what's in it." Or something to that effect.
Watching Obama's speeches, I make a great effort trying to find something that is true (or close enough to the truth), unfortunately, to no avail.
Is there a virus on the loose and perhaps it is why so many people get nausea when Barry Soetoro fills their TV screen? We could call it "irritable stomach syndrome"!
The Intimidator-in-Chief, has shown his true colors long ago, are Americans going to wake-up and see what is happening to their country?

God Bless America!
Joseph A. Gamero