The Pentagon has worried for months that a project backed by a prominent Democratic donor might interfere with military GPS. Now Congress wants to know if the White House pressured a general to change his testimony.
The four-star Air Force general who oversees Air Force Space Command walked into a highly secured room on Capitol Hill a week ago to give a classified briefing to lawmakers and staff, and dropped a surprise. Pressed by members, Gen. William Shelton said the White House tried to pressure him to change his testimony to make it more favorable to a company tied to a large Democratic donor.
The episode —confirmed by The Daily
 Beast in interviews with administration officials and the chairman of a
 congressional oversight committee —is the latest in a string of 
incidents that have given Republicans sudden fodder for questions about 
whether the Obama administration is politically interfering in routine 
government matters that affect donors or fundraisers. Already, the FBI 
and a House committee are investigating a federal loan guarantee to a now failed solar firm called Solyndra that is tied to a large Obama fundraiser.
Now the Pentagon has been raising 
concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company 
in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment 
fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.
                  According to 
officials familiar with the situation, Shelton’s prepared testimony was 
leaked in advance to the company. And the White House asked the general 
to alter the testimony to add two points: that the general supported the
 White House policy to add more broadband for commercial use; and that 
the Pentagon would try to resolve the questions around LightSquared with
 testing in just 90 days. Shelton chafed at the intervention, which 
seemed to soften the Pentagon’s position and might be viewed as helping 
the company as it tries to get the project launched, officials said.
                  “There was an 
attempt to influence the text of the testimony and to engage 
LightSquared in the process in order to bias his testimony,” Rep. Mike 
Turner (R-OH) said in an interview. “The only people who were involved 
in the process in preparation for the hearing included the Department of
 Defense, the White House, and the Office Management and Budget.”
                  Turner is 
chairman of the House Armed Services subcommittee that oversees 
Shelton’s space command and GPS issues; the panel explored the issues 
between LightSquared and the Pentagon at a hearing Thursday.
                  On Thursday, 
LightSquared CEO,Sanjiv Ahuja told The Daily Beast that his company was 
not trying to use politics to affect the regulatory process and the 
firm's goal was to expand broadband access across America.
"Any suggestion that we have run 
roughshod over the regulatory process is contradicted by reality: Our 
plans to begin implementing America's first privately funded, wholesale,
 affordable, coast-to-coast wireless broadband service have been delayed
 for a year and we have been forced to commit more than $100 million to 
find a solution that will allow consumers to benefit from both our 
service and GPS,” Ahuja said.
                  "For a company 
that allegedly is ‘wired’ inside the Beltway, we've been unable to even 
get the House Armed Services Committee to allow us to have one 
representative today’s hearing — a hearing in which we are the subject,”
 he said.
                  Shelton finally 
gave his testimony Thursday, and made clear the Pentagon's concern about
 LightSquared's project.
                  The general told 
Turner's committee that preliminary tests of a new LightSquared proposal
 to use only a portion of the band that it was licensed originally in 
2004 would cause significant disruptions to GPS.
                  He said the GPS 
spectrum was supposed to originally be a “quiet neighborhood,” meaning 
that lower strength signals could exist near the GPS spectrum. Speaking 
of the LightSquared plan, he said, “If you put a rock band in the middle
 of that quiet neighborhood, that’s a different circumstance.”
                  The White House confirmed Wednesday that its Office of
 Management and Budget suggested changes to the general’s testimony but 
insisted such reviews are routine and not influenced by politics. And it
 said Shelton was permitted to give the testimony he wants, without any 
pressure.
           
       OMB “reviews and clears all agency communications with Congress, 
including testimony, to ensure consistency in the administration’s 
policy positions,” said White House spokesman Eric Schultz.
“When an agency is asked by a congressional committee to testify, OMB circulates the agency’s proposed [draft] testimony to other affected agencies and appropriate [executive office of the president] staff. If a reviewer has a comment to the proposed testimony, that suggestion is typically conveyed to the agency for their consideration. When divergent views emerge, they are often reconciled through discussions at the appropriate policy levels of OMB and the agencies.” The general’s office declined to comment.
“When an agency is asked by a congressional committee to testify, OMB circulates the agency’s proposed [draft] testimony to other affected agencies and appropriate [executive office of the president] staff. If a reviewer has a comment to the proposed testimony, that suggestion is typically conveyed to the agency for their consideration. When divergent views emerge, they are often reconciled through discussions at the appropriate policy levels of OMB and the agencies.” The general’s office declined to comment.
           
       LightSquared has previously acknowledged it met with officials 
from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy as it tried
 to shepherd the project, which is consistent with President Obama’s 
goal of trying to expand broadband wireless access nationwide. That 
office has a mandate to meet with members of private industry.
           
       Melanie Sloan, who runs the nonpartisan ethics groups Citizens 
for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said the emerging 
allegations about possible White House involvement in LightSquared’s 
matter seemed to mirror earlier allegations in the Solyndra case.
           
       “With this new set of facts, it starts to sound like a pattern of
 the White House improperly pressuring people at agencies involving 
decisions that affect companies tied to donors and fundraisers,” Sloan 
said. “It’s always a problem when the White House is pressuring anyone’s
 testimony. I don’t care if you are a four-star [general] or a GS-15 
[career employee], you should be giving your true opinion and not an 
opinion the White House is seeking for political expediency."
           
       Sloan recalled similar instances during the Bush administration, 
when officials were accused of trying to meddle with climate scientists’
 testimony. “It doesn’t matter what party is in charge, money frequently
 trumps good policy in Washington,” she said.
           
       Mr. Ahuja gave a little more than $30,000 to both the Democratic 
and Republican parties in the last two years. Mr. Falcone and his wife 
have gave more than $60,000 in 2009 to the Democratic Senatorial 
Campaign Committee. Mr. Falcone has also given a smattering of money to 
Republicans.
           
       At issue is a conditional Federal Communications Commission 
waiver granted in January to LightSquared to build cheap terrestrial 
wireless capacity in a section of the wireless spectrum close to the GPS
 bandwidth. Harbinger Capital, the hedge fund belonging to Falcone, owns
 a majority stake in LightSquared.
           
       The FCC license has come under scrutiny because technical experts
 have warned that LightSquared’s proposal to build tens of thousands of 
ground stations for a wireless network could drown out the GPS signal. 
On Tuesday, the FCC issued a public notice stating that LightSquared may
 not move forward on establishing its wireless service until further 
testing proves the GPS would not be harmed.
           
       Falcone says the FCC waiver was spurred by the demands of the 
wireless industry. “LightSquared wanted the waiver because some of its 
wholesale partners wanted the choice of being able to sell devices with 
either satellite only, terrestrial-only or combined 
satellite-terrestrial service,” he told The Daily Beast. “The waiver 
allows us to meet the specific needs of our customers — but it in no way
 affected the spectrum issue.”
                  Falcone added, “The GPS industry decided not to oppose
 us in the early 2000's because they thought we'd never be successful. 
It was only after they realized we were not just a concept, but a viable
 technology with a viable business model, that they decided to oppose 
us. Meanwhile, LightSquared invested billions of dollars — that is money
 that comes from private individuals all over the country — based on the
 promise the FCC gave us under a Republican administration six years 
ago. The point is that any suggestion that the waiver created 
LightSquared out of thin air is both specious and absurd.”
           
       Turner said Shelton told his committee that LightSquared had 
obtained his earlier prepared testimony.
But Jeffrey J. Carlisle, Executive Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy for LightSquared said Thursday that the company never received Shelton’s testimony scheduled for August 3.
But Jeffrey J. Carlisle, Executive Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Public Policy for LightSquared said Thursday that the company never received Shelton’s testimony scheduled for August 3.
           
       A U.S. government official who spoke on the condition of 
anonymity said the White House specifically asked Shelton to include a 
paragraph in his testimony that stated the military would continue to 
test the proposed bandwidth for ways LightSquared could still use the 
spectrum space without interfering with GPS. The proposed language for 
Shelton’s testimony also stated that he hoped the necessary testing for 
LightSquared would be completed within 90 days.
           
       The White House has said it did not try to influence the 
licensing process for LightSquared at the FCC. Chairman Julius 
Genachowski also has said the White House never lobbied him about 
LightSquared. Republicans are now questioning whether the administration
 has been rushing approval of the project over the objections of experts
 ranging from GPS companies like Garmin to the military’s own advisory 
committee on satellites.
           
       “The FCC’s fast-tracking of LightSquared raises questions about 
whether the government is rushing this project at the expense of all 
kinds of other things, including national security and everyone who uses
 GPS, from agriculture to emergency medical technicians,” said Sen. 
Chuck Grassley (R-IA). “Without transparency, and with media coverage of
 political connections in this case, there’s no way to know whether the 
agency is trying to help friends in need or really looking out for the 
public’s interest.”
           
       In April, Grassley asked Genachowski to hand over all records of 
communications, including emails between Falcone and the FCC, and 
LightSquared and the FCC. Genachowski declined to turn over those 
records.
                  The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative journalism organization, published emails this week it had obtained showing meetings between White House technology advisers and LightSquared officials.
 
 
