Saturday, July 30, 2011

Obama Kills Another 500,000 Non-Union Jobs


John Ransom

Obama just destroyed another 500,000 jobs for Americans- at least ones who aren’t unionized. .

Flanked by flunkies from the government-dependent auto makers, the world’s largest shareholder in the American auto industry, Brarack Obama, imposed increased fuel standards on companies making cars in the United States. By 2025 auto makers will have to meet fuel efficiency standards that brings “new cars to 54.5 miles a gallon by 2025, roughly double the current level, in a bid to reduce U.S. oil consumption,” says the Wall Street Journal.

According to the Journal effort by the administration to raise the current fuel standard just to “the 35.5 mpg target by 2016 will cost the industry more than $50 billion.” The administration didn’t provide the Journal with costs for the 2025 standard but expect it to cost a ton, jobs-wise and financially.

$50 billion is about 100,000 American jobs- that’s non-union jobs.

(Story continues below...)
We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!
Member Options
Your Comments

That, in short is where all the jobs have gone under the Obama administration.

Makes one wonder if the only reason why the president doesn’t ban cars altogether is because of the union jobs.

Non-union jobs just aren’t that big of a deal.

As the foreign auto makers point out the rules are written to favor the Detroit, union-controlled, domestic auto makers.

“Not all auto makers support Mr. Obama's plan,” says the Journal.

“German auto makers Daimler AG and Volkswagen AG both declined to send representatives to Mr. Obama's announcement. Representatives for both companies, whose sales in the U.S. are dominated by passenger cars, said the deal would put their companies at a disadvantage, by setting relatively modest requirements for large pickups like the kind that Detroit auto makers like GM, Ford and Chrysler have long produced.”

Coincidentally, the United Auto Workers have targeted German automaker Volkswagen AG’s Tennessee plant as “a focal point in union efforts to gain a foothold among foreign auto makers' U.S. manufacturing operations,’ reports the Journal in a separate story.

On Thursday I wrote about how the SEIU is facing racketing charges related to possibly using federal regulatory pressure against private companies in order to facilitate union organizing in non-union shops.

While thus far there have been no allegations regarding the UAW, there certainly is the consequent regulatory pressure.

As The Journal notes: “The union has run into particularly stiff opposition at foreign-owned plants in Tennessee and other Southern states, where cultural sentiment against unions runs deep and right-to-work laws allow workers to opt out of unions where they exist. Nissan workers in Tennessee rejected UAW representation by 2-1 ratios in 2001 and 1989.”

Ah, but it’s nothing a little regulatory pressure can’t get around.
Read more >>

Demonizing Christianity

Bill O'Reilly

The front-page headline in The New York Times last Sunday was stunning: "As Horrors Emerge, Norway Charges Christian Extremist."

That would be Anders Behring Breivik, the 32-year-old who has confessed to taking at least 76 innocent lives apparently because he doesn't like Muslims living in Europe.

But why would the Times brand Breivik a Christian? He is not attached to any church, has no history of Christian activity, has openly criticized the Protestant philosophy and has admitted to committing acts counter to all Christian teaching.

(Story continues below...)
We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!
Member Options
Your Comments

Defenders of the headline point to a Norwegian police officer who reportedly described Breivik as a Christian who desired to be a member of the Knights Templar, a medieval society that avenged anti-Christian behavior.

Perhaps The New York Times might watch out for the Knights.

According to reporting by the website NewsBusters, the Times wasn't so quick to brand the men who killed 52 people in the London subway bombings back in 2005. The Times story on that terror incident described the situation this way: "(T)he plot was carried out by a sleeper cell of homegrown extremists rather than highly trained terrorists exported to Britain."

Homegrown? The four London killers were all Muslim extremists, yet the Times avoided the religious label.

If the paper were consistent, it would have described Breivik as "homegrown," right? The guy was born and raised in Norway.

So why are The New York Times and some other liberal media playing the "Christian extremist" card?

Two reasons. First, some on the left want to make an equivalency argument between Muslim terrorism and other kinds of violent acts. The Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh, was often branded "a right-wing terrorist" in the media. Terrorism is terrorism the analysis goes. It's not fair to constantly emphasize Muslim terrorism without acknowledging the others. Besides, bad men like George W. Bush hype the Muslim threat and use it to do evil things such as invade Iraq.

The second reason is purely political. The left well understands that Christian opposition to things like abortion, gay marriage and drug legalization makes those liberal causes more difficult to achieve. Thus, anything that diminishes Christianity is fair game to be promoted. Every newsworthy sin committed by a Christian is highlighted with a sneering reference to hypocrisy. Any whiff of Christian intolerance is celebrated in the press.

Breivik did not kill in the name of Jesus. He was not a member of a Christian-based al-Qaida-like group. He was not funded by Iran or enabled by Pakistan. It seems he is simply a murderer, a man devoid of any spiritual conscience, a direct descendant of Cain.

Yet, somehow, Breivik is now a member of a peace-loving, compassionate group, at least according to some media. He's a Christian.

Who knew?
Read more >>

Poor are not poor because rich are rich


Star Parker

A just-released study from the Pew Research Center reporting a record high wealth gap between whites and blacks should have been labeled "handle with care."

Because care is needed to examine the complex reality behind the fact that "median wealth of white households is 20 times that of black households. …" And without care, this information will be abused and misused by those in the race business as another excuse to claim racism and demand exactly what blacks, or any of us, do not need – more government.

And, indeed, Al Sharpton has already announced plans for protest in Washington, along with the statement: "For those who think we live in some sort of post-racial society, I have news for you: We're anything but."

For one thing, "median wealth" should not be confused with "average wealth." "Median" is simply the number right in the middle – there are an equal number of households with higher and an equal number with lower wealth. "Average wealth" accounts for the actual wealth of those households and reflects the fact, not reflected in the median number, that there are a good number of well-to-do black households.

(Story continues below...)

We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!

Member Options
Your Comments

So whereas median white household wealth is 20 times higher than median black household wealth, average white household wealth is three times higher than average black household wealth.

The racially tinged headline obscures the deeper reality of what is driving the growing wealth gap. That is that over the period of the study, 2005 to 2009, the gap between those with more wealth and those with less has increased for the whole country.

In fact, over this period, the gap between the most wealthy and least wealthy blacks became more pronounced than the gap between the most wealthy and least wealthy whites.

In 2005, the top 10 percent wealthy black families represented 56 percent of overall black wealth. By 2009, this top 10 percent represented 67 percent of overall black wealth.

You have to wonder what kind of racial claims Al Sharpton will make about this.

All this is not to minimize a genuine problem. Far more important than where black wealth stands relative to white wealth is the fact that median, or average, black wealth is far less than it should be.

That 35 percent of all black households have zero or negative wealth (net indebtedness) is dismally sad.

What to do?

If there are any public policy implications, it is not to expand government, but to remove it as obstacle to black wealth creation.

At the most basic level, black children need to get better education, and this means giving black parents choice to send their children wherever they want to school.

A better educated black population will mean a higher income-earning black population. But income alone is a limited tool for creating wealth. Wealth is created through savings, investment and entrepreneurship. And blacks lag far behind in each category.

The Pew study shows that the major destruction of wealth from 2005 to 2009 resulted from the collapse of housing prices. Blacks suffered disproportionately because black net worth has been almost entirely in their homes.

The idea of allowing investment in a personal retirement account rather than paying the Social Security payroll tax would be a boon to building black wealth.

But when President Bush suggested the personal retirement account idea, NAACP chairman Julian Bond said this was asking blacks "to play the lottery with their future."

A life of government guarantees and controls is not a formula for building wealth. Freedom and capital markets are. Blacks need to decide which they want.

And entrepreneurship must become part of black culture. Blacks need to get that poor people are not poor because rich people are rich.

The formula for more black wealth: less government, more ownership and initiative.
Read more >>

So you say you want a revolution?

Patrice Lewis

Consider these recent news headlines:
  • Republican and Democratic leaders are floating the idea of a new "Super Congress" not authorized in the Constitution
  • A legislative proposal in San Francisco seeks to make ex-cons and felons a protected class, along with existing categories of residents like African-Americans, people with disabilities and pregnant women.
  • The Ohio appellate court handed down a critical Second Amendment-bending decision over the weekend in which a minor offense can eliminate one's right to bear arms.
  • In the latest chapter of the gunrunning scandal known as Operation Fast and Furious, federal officials won't say how two suspects obtained more than 360 weapons despite criminal records that should have prevented them from buying even one gun.
Shall I go on? I located these headlines in about 30 seconds. I can list more if you like.

As these articles abundantly illustrate, our elected officials have abandoned all pretence of adhering to the Constitution and Bill of Rights. They don't even bother pretending anymore. In fact, their attitude is mockery and downright hostility whenever it is suggested that the government should limit itself to the small, streamlined entity it was meant to be.

Today, anyone who suggests our government is out of control is labeled a right-wing extremist or even a domestic terrorist. Yet all the constitutionalists and tea partiers want to do is return our nation to the governmental restraints outlined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. We do not want a theocracy. We do not want an oligarchy. Is this too much to ask?

Sadly, yes. The progressives and the constitutionalists have no middle ground anymore. Listening to the arguments on both the left and the right provides abundant evidence that our nation as it currently exists is not salvageable. Freedom and slavery can never reach an accord.

I mean that in all seriousness. America as it was meant to be cannot be brought back on track. There are too many powerful people – virtually the entire government, mainstream media and populations of large urban areas – who are too addicted to spending, to entitlements, to control and to manufactured "rights." It's too late.

In an earlier column, I wrote that We the People are actually living in an occupied nation; the occupier – the enemy – is our own government. But progressives don't see the problem. That is, they don't see that an ever-growing governmental body is a bad thing – and they'd like to see more of it. They want our wealth redistributed. They want unconstitutional entitlements such as health care. They want the debt ceiling raised. They want everything they can lay their hands on when it comes to their agenda, and the Constitution be damned.

"The federal government is an out-of-control beast, no longer a body of representatives of the people but rather a house of aristocracy whose members do nothing unless it's for the good of their house," wrote a reader. "We the People have become nothing more than wage slaves to the gluttonous bloated entity our government has become. Nothing short of a military coup d'etat is capable of restoring our country back to the people, back to what was intended by the Founders."

(Story continues below...)

We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!

Member Options
Your Comments

But I'm not so sure a coup d'etat would work. Oh sure, the tea party could take over Washington and begin to run the government within the original constraints intended by the Founding Fathers, but what then? The progressives would hate it. They would launch a counter-revolution. Civil war would ensue, and no matter who "won," the problems would remain.
 
And what are the irreconcilable problems on which the left and the right cannot agree? Simple: It's the vision of government. It's the degree to which government should be involved in the lives of individuals.
That's why I'm still of the mind that the only solution is division. We need a Progressive States of America, or PSA, and a Constitutional States of America, or CSA. As cruel and unfair as the mechanics of separating our nation would be, what other answer is there?

So which form of government is likely to work out? Interestingly, the study of history provides abundant examples of both types of government and what the likely outcomes may be.

Examples of progressive governments include Germany, Russia, Italy, North Korea, Cuba, China and endless numbers of other countries in which people have lost their freedoms.

We need look no further than our own history to find an example of constitutional government. Riddled with mistakes as it was, our nation leaped ahead 5,000 years in terms of technology, medicine, manufacturing, standard of living and other benefits – all due to the unique freedom from governmental interference our founders laid out. "By 1976," notes author W. Cleon Skousen, "the 'noble experiment' of American independence and free-enterprise economics had produced some phenomenal results … [it] allowed science to thrive in an explosion of inventions and technical discoveries …" Communication was revolutionized, the average life span was doubled and our standard of living was exponentially enhanced.
But this isn't good enough for the progressives. They want to make over our nation in their own image. They desire power instead of freedom. They prefer to be slave masters of a bankrupt state over being part of a free society.

So let's give them what they want.

Let's leap ahead and pretend that our nation has already divided. Most of the people reading this column will chose to live in the CSA. But what about those who chose to live in the PSA?

When the dust of producing a new country has settled and the hoopla has died down, the citizens of the PSA may eventually recognize what we've been trying to tell them all along: They've been able to get away with all their whining about entitlements and fake "rights" for as long as they have because they've been riding on the backs of those who supported our original Constitution. When that document is thrown out, everyone will want to get on the government dole. To paraphrase Margaret Thatcher, their socialism will work just fine until they run out of other peoples' money.

Then, and only then, might they realize how good they had it before screwing it up. And then we'll get to say, "I told you so."
Read more >>

Talk about 'peddling paranoia'

As the darkness created by social upheaval and worldwide changes grip the world, there are a few lights across the globe that offer hope, stability and a view into the marvelous grace of the living God. Bill and Gloria Gaither along with the Gaither Trio and all the participants of the “Homecoming Series,” seen by millions all across the globe, are an unparalleled gospel music beacon of hope and encouragement in a world of sinking sands.

Indiana born, Bill Gaither has become an unmistakable gospel music icon with numerous awards but in 2000 he and his wife Gloria, were named the Gospel Songwriters of the Century by the American Society of Composers and Performers. Bill’s real success has little to do with awards. His success can be estimated only by those he has inspired, encouraged and pointed or re-pointed to the Lord Jesus Christ through his music.

(Story continues below...)

We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!

Member Options
Your Comments

SPLC made a name for itself by suing the Ku Klux Klan. After taking out this repulsive organization, and making millions in the process, it seems SPLC had to find new bogeymen to keep its crusading leadership in caviar.

The group is still playing the race card – linking anyone to the right of Arlen Specter with racism, extremism, militarism, hate, anti-immigrant vigilantism and, perhaps worst of all on the Morris Dees scale, "so-called patriot groups."

Enemies of SPLC include the tea-party movement, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, Michele Bachmann, Judge Andrew Napolitano, Rep. Ron Paul, Rep. Paul Broun and me. I seem to make it into every one of the group's screeds, I'm honored to say.

Who is the SPLC? I think Reason writer Jesse Walker may have said it best last month when he wrote: "The Southern Poverty Law Center … would paint a box of Wheaties as an extremist threat if it thought that would help it raise funds."

The SPLC's stock-in-trade is raising hundreds of millions of dollars through fanning the flames of phantom threats posed almost exclusively by those who love America and its Constitution. He also files lots of lawsuits, sometimes even on behalf of real victims of racism, and pockets most of the money raised through heart-wrenching direct-mail pitches.

The most famous example was a judgment he won for a black woman whose son was killed by the Ku Klux Klan. While Dees and company raised $9 million sending out solicitation letters featuring a gruesome picture of the victim, the mom received a total of $51,875 in the settlement. Dees pays himself more than $280,000 a year from the "charity."

Do you get the picture?

Nevertheless, sadly, Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center get plenty of ink and face time in the Old Media. Their reports are peddled like cheap wine at a frat-house party in venues like PMSNBC and the Old York Times.

But it's not like these people don't have wealthy, influential and powerful friends listening to them. More than a few noted the striking similarities between the over-the-top rhetoric of SPLC and that infamous Department of Homeland Security report that warned about how pro-lifers and returning veterans represented threats to the republic.

It's not surprising the group seized on the tea-party movement, the most potent grass-roots political uprising in my lifetime. Fear-mongering is what the SPLC is all about – and turning it into a profit center.

So where's the big payoff for all the name-calling?

After all, even many on the left side of the political spectrum have criticized SPLC for a bark much worse than its bite. Only a tiny percentage of its huge bank account ever goes to filing litigation. More goes to fundraising.

Yet, that hasn't deterred some pretty big names in the world of left-leaning foundations from opening up their coffers with generous grants. They include:

the Arcus Foundation,

the Baltimore Community Foundation,

the Cisco Systems Foundation,

the Cleveland Foundation,

the Naomi and Nehemiah Cohen Foundation,

the Columbus Foundation and Affiliated Organizations,

the Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan,

the Community Foundation for the National Capital Region,

Community Foundation (Silicon Valley),

the Cushman Family Foundation,

the Dibner Fund,

the Joseph and Bessie Feinberg Foundation,

the Ford Foundation,

the Edward and Verna Gerbic Family Foundation,

the Jackson and Irene Golden 1989 Charitable Trust,

the Lisa and Douglas Goldman Fund,

the Grove Foundation,

the J.M. Kaplan Fund,

the J.P Morgan Chase Foundation,

the Kaplen Foundation,

George Soros' Open Society Institute,

the Albert Parvin Foundation,

the Picower Foundation,

the Jay Pritzker Foundation,

the Louis and Harold Price Foundation,

the Public Welfare Foundation,

the Raine and Stanley Silverstein Family Foundation,

the Spiegel Foundation,

the State Street Foundation,

the Steinberg Charitable Trust,

the Vanguard Public Foundation.

If you're reading this, chances are good the Southern Poverty Law Center sees you as a racist, militant, extremist, gun-toting, hate-mongering, anti-government patriot.

But, don't worry. Look who's doing the name-calling! Wear those insults as a badge of honor.
Read more >>

Bill Gaither and the Trio: A National Treasure, A Last Days Beacon

As the darkness created by social upheaval and worldwide changes grip the world, there are a few lights across the globe that offer hope, stability and a view into the marvelous grace of the living God. Bill and Gloria Gaither along with the Gaither Trio and all the participants of the “Homecoming Series,” seen by millions all across the globe, are an unparalleled gospel music beacon of hope and encouragement in a world of sinking sands.

Indiana born, Bill Gaither has become an unmistakable gospel music icon with numerous awards but in 2000 he and his wife Gloria, were named the Gospel Songwriters of the Century by the American Society of Composers and Performers. Bill’s real success has little to do with awards. His success can be estimated only by those he has inspired, encouraged and pointed or re-pointed to the Lord Jesus Christ through his music.

(Story continues below...)

We are in a dire situation in this country today, and small publications like this one do not have the huge resources of George Soros pouring in like our liberal friends.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like NPR.

Worth Reading is not funded by the government like PBS.


Please become a supporting member and help fund this ongoing effort to provide you with news and commentary relevant to our divided nation.

Help us get back our simple conservative values. Remember, the Bigger the Government - the Smaller the citizen!

Member Options
Your Comments

Perhaps the second part of the Gaither’s success is because of the amazing company he keeps. Iconic musicians of every kind and description are part of the famed Homecoming series. There are simply too many to name but among them both past and present are Ben Speer, George Younce, Jake Hess, and Vestal and Howard Goodman. Those who make up the rest of the list are each among the most prodigious gospel singers and musicians this world has ever produced.

Every musician playing in the Homecoming series is above average and we can only wish that a little more of an introduction was offered in the video series to help us to get acquainted with the lives of those great musicians. Impossible to miss is the late Anthony Burger who died of a heart attack in 2006. Burger’s hands, severely burned in childhood were healed, some would say by the miraculous power of God, to allow Burger to become an unmistakable child prodigy.

His piano styling’s and interpretation of gospel music is still the mark that others often use to gauge their success or progress. Words cannot describe the performances of Anthony Burger. Watching him play the piano can exhaust you and the only way such energy and skill could possibly be explained is that it was, the full power of God’s Holy Spirit at work, in one willing musician.

The Gaither Trio developed later in Bill’s career is made up of Bill, Mark Lowry, Guy Penrod and David Phelps. Each has such a distinctly different personality and style that it seems like a miracle that they ever found each other and decided to work together.

Bill normally sings the bass and baritone parts but his personality is soft, he hardly seems like the glue that would hold the Trio together. He is a steady man with only one apparent purpose in life and that is to glorify the Lord Jesus Christ with his music and that is what accounts for the fact that he was able to draw and utilize the talents of others of like mind.

Mark Lowry stumbled into comedy when he was performing because when he tried to fill the “dead air” between songs, people began laugh at his stories and antics. But when he sings the laughing comes to an abrupt halt. Lowry has so much character and style in his voice that even if he were to whisper you would still be spellbound. His rendition of “Mary, Did You Know” is a journey into a part of the gospel that everyone is familiar with, but will never see so clearly, until they have heard Mark Lowry bring it to life in a visionary musical theophany.

Guy Penrod, a Tennessean and the Trio’s leader until 2008, is the father of eight children, all of them homeschooled. Although he is now singing solo he was the tallest ground stake the Trio ever knew until his departure from the Gaither’s homecomings. It is arguable which of his songs are the best, but one of the all time favorites is a soft piece called “Knowing you’ll Be There” that seems to stir the hearts of many believers.

Then along comes David Phelps. The tenor of the group, Phelps has perfect intonation, impeccable annunciation and a vocal range and power that exceed the Irish and Italian tenors of the day. He has what might be called, a world class voice, but with the power of the Holy Spirit behind him his voice passes out of mere world-class to, spiritually transcendent. Two Grammy awards and Dove awards are not the high point of his music. His music alone can define the high point of his career; hearing Phelps sing is the only way to fully understand what he has accomplished and contributed to the field of gospel music.

Phelps sings with such virtuosity that trying to pick his best is very hard. One song that brings audiences to tears in full reverence to God is “No More Night” written by Walt Harrah. Those who know the promises of Christ’s return and who have ever pondered the vision of the promised Holy City that God himself is preparing for the redeemed, are never closer to seeing this great portent than when David sings this song. The chorus says it all.

No more night. No more pain
No more tears. Never crying again.
And praises to the great “I Am.”
We will live in the light of the Risen Lamb

Many have noticed that the contemporary Christian music of today often does not point directly to Jesus Christ and in some songs his name is never mentioned. Also there is the tendency to repeat single lines instead of using a story line or a biblical example in contemporary music. Finally where gospel music uses resounding chorus lines and final crescendos to bring a song to its heights, contemporary music tends to use drums or loud instrumentals to fill and end a song. This is not only one of the chief differences of gospel music but it is what makes it, for many people, a much richer musical experience.

One of the other distinctions of American gospel music is that it deals with leaving earth for a far better home. It reminds believers that the walk is not just an endless strain of trials and tribulations but it has a wonderful final destination. The pictures of heaven, the millennial kingdom, and the reunions are a way to focus on the final destination instead of the arduousness of the present task at hand. The Homecomings have plenty of this and a few entire programs are dedicated to this purpose, which accounts for the uplifting nature of them all.

Other styles and genres of music are always included in the homecomings, some incorporated into the larger group and at other times they are guests. Black Gospel singer Jesse Dixon, a regular at homecomings, can get an audience up out of their seats clapping and swaying to the music like no one else. The hard driving bluegrass syncopations of Doyle Lawson and Quicksilver blend into special shows easily as do others who represent the best of contemporary, blues, classical and operatic.

Gaither has gone beyond the commonly held idea that many genres of music came out of the church. Not many argue that the church has helped to generate many emerging genres across the years. What Bill Gaither has done is to draw our attention away from what came out from the church, back to the great stuff that is still in the church.

Another notable achievement of the Homecoming series has nothing to do with Bill but can only be credited to the collective body of singers and performers that have joined with Bill across the years. To watch these artists perform, it doesn’t take long to see that it is far more than a mere performance. Soaring far above just performance craft, the emotional investment, the strong bond of fellowship among them and the obvious experiential involvement of the singers with their Savior is what makes it a true experience for their audiences, and not just a performance.

The entire gospel music experience has been granted a sort of, grand master, in the life and ministry of Bill Gaither. His total contribution to the inspiration of America through his music is inestimable. He is perhaps living out the words penned in the third verse of “He Touched Me” which is the most popular song he has ever written. He has literally fulfilled these words so far, and we can only hope that he will continue to do so until the Lord returns.

Since I met this blessed Savior
Since he cleansed and made me whole
I will never cease to praise him
I’ll shout it while eternity rolls

Until time meets up with Revelation 10: 6, “And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer;” we can pray that the entire Gaither experience will be here with us, to bring hope and to be a beacon of light in a very dark world.

http://www.americanprophet.org has since 2005 featured the articles of columnist Rev Michael Bresciani along with news and reviews that have earned this site the title of The Website for Insight. Millions have read his timely reports and articles in online journals and print publications across the nation and the globe.

Keywords:

Bill Gaither,Bill Gaither Trio,David Phelps,Guy Penrod,Mark Lowry,Vestal Goodman,Howard Goodman,Jake Hess,Ben Speer,George Younce,Anthony Burger,Ben Speer,gospel songwriters of the century,Dove awards,Gaither Homecomings,power of God’s Holy Spirit,contemporary Christian music,A last days Beacon,He Touched Me,Gloria Gaither,Mary, Did You Know,No More Night,leaving earth for a far better home,Jesse Dixon,Doyle Lawson,bluegrass
Read more >>

Top military brass slam Obama, Reid proposed budget cuts

by Jim Kouri 
 
"We are the only Army in the world, where if [a soldier] is asking for something, anything, he knows he's going to get it. And that is a level of trust we have with the soldiers of the United States Army. We just need to make sure, that whatever we do, we never take away his ability and his belief that if in combat, he asks for it, he's going to get it." -- General Peter Chiarelli- Vice Chief Of Staff, United States Army

According General Martin Dempsey, President Obama's nominee to be the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, it would be "extraordinarily difficult and very high risk" to cut $800 billion from defense spending as is proposed by President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid as part of efforts to reduce the national debt.

General Dempsey accurately points out that "national security didn't cause the debt crisis nor will it solve it." Despite this fact, Senate Democrats and the President continue to insist on cutting defense to pay for deficit reduction anywhere from $400 billion to over $800 billion.

Truth be told, because entitlement spending has tripled while defense spending declined as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), entitlement spending (Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security) is now 10 percent of GDP, whereas defense spending is only 5 percent.
 
As documented in The Heritage Foundation's 2011 Budget Chart Book, even eliminating all defense spending would not solve the federal spending crisis. Since 1976, annual entitlement spending has exceeded defense spending, even with the cost of wars such as Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
While many local political leaders -- governors, mayors, county executives and their staffs -- believe it's better to reduce the bloated military budget than cutting social programs, they forget the axiom,
"We must fight them over there, so we don't have to fight them over here."

Service Chiefs Wary of Deep Cuts

This sentiment was underscored by four senior military officers at a Readiness Subcommittee hearing on Wednesday where all four leaders told the subcommittee that they are "currently unable to meet all the needs of the military's regional combatant commanders," according to the Hill. The Vice Chiefs and the Assistant Commandant all stated on the record that they could not withstand additional, significant defense cuts without fundamentally altering force structure and strategy.

They offered a chilling, but realistic view of their current readiness status and what might happen to U.S. national security strategy should cuts be enacted on this level.

United States Marine Corps, Assistant Commandant General Joseph Dunford:

"Marines and their gear at their home stations were in a 'degraded readiness state,' thanks to their decade of war, meaning they'd be late to 'respond to unexpected crises.'

"Dunford, told a House subcommittee that he had enough Marines to service the needs of CENTCOM (Central Command) but not the other commands. In other words, the Marines are stretched thin, a point that McKeon says applies to the entire military," according to Fox News.

"The Marines would face challenges in absorbing its share of a $400 billion cut. If cuts go beyond that, we would have to start making some fundamental changes in the nature of the Marine Corps,"  Dunford said.

United States Navy, Vice Chief Admiral Jonathan Greenert:

"Greenert said the Navy needs more ships to meet demands of combatant commanders worldwide."

"The stress on the force is real," Greenert said. "and it has been relentless."

United States Air Force, Vice Chief General Philip Breedlove:

"Air Force Vice Chief Gen. Phillip Breedlove said defense cuts larger than $400 billion would force a 'fundamental' change in how the service meets its part of the military's mission, and force it to reduce 'capacity,' meaning equipment."

"Some portions of the Air Force are right at the ragged edge."

United States Army, Vice Chief General Peter Chiarelli:

"The Army is also stretched too thin, Chiarelli warned, and noted that the Army still  hasn't met goals for dwell time at home for American troops.

Chiarelli, also said "Bigger reductions would require his service do a 'major reassessment' of how it carries out its missions."


According to the Vice Chiefs and the Assistant Commandant, the logical conclusion is that drastic defense cuts will require a new national security approach.

The question is – will we force our military to do more with less? The President has not made the distinction between cuts and military strategy, instead proposing defense cuts while expanding the military's mission (Libya, Japan, Haiti, fighting pirates off the coast of Africa) and expecting our troops to maintain their current duties.

If enacted, defense cuts discussed by the President and Senator Reid mean that our Armed Services will have to do a "major reassessment" of how they carry out their missions, as the Vice Chiefs and the Assistant Commandant acknowledged.The President should be frank with American people about the condition of our military and recognize the potentially disastrous consequences of his proposed cuts," said Chiarelli.

 
Jim Kouri, CPP, formerly Fifth Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, an editor for ConservativeBase.com, and he's a columnist for Examiner.com.  In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. 

He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations.  He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.   Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.   Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc. 

Read more >>

Obama administration cancels DHS nuclear detection program

by Jim Kouri

The Obama administration canceled a $1.2 billion program to install nuclear material detectors at U.S. ports of entry, according to a statement from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

According to Tuesday's DHS statement to the U.S. Congress, the equipment is unreliable as far as its "technical glitches" that included false positives or false alarms.
 
Even so, the Homeland Security Department plans to give a go-ahead for implementing a small-scale version of the original plan using handheld radiation detectors.

"The idea is to detect radiation and identify the kind of material producing it," said security consultant and anti-terrorism expert Nick Gloss.

"The Homeland Security Department spent $230 million over five years to develop the equipment and I dare say they will not tell lawmakers that they have nothing to show for it," said Gloss.

Following several "Red Team" undercover operations that revealed undercover operatives were able to sneak radioactive material into the United States across both north and south borders and through other entry points, the DHS and the White House have been under pressure to correct the security vulnerabilities regarding weapons of mass destruction.

At a cost of $822,000 for each of the faulty devices, the original plan was to install them at 1,400 sites where shipped materials enter the United States.

The Homeland Security Department rushed to complete the technology using poorly designed tests that made it difficult to "draw reliable conclusions" about whether the equipment worked properly, the National Academy of Sciences reported. A more recent Government Accountability Office report said projected costs of the equipment have risen significantly.

In addition, without better performance tests, the Homeland Security Department lacks "the input it needs to determine whether ASP is ready to progress toward production and deployment," the GAO report said.

The Advanced Spectroscopic Portal program was the Obama administration's response to intelligence reports indicating that terrorists may attempt to enter the U.S. with nuclear weapons or radiological material used to create so-called dirty bombs into the United States in cargo containers. Dirty bombs are conventional explosives packaged with radiological material.

At the time of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, only about 2 percent of the cargo entering the United States was inspected by Customs and Border Protection. Congress set a goal in 2006 of inspecting 100 percent of the incoming cargo for nuclear material.

"The threat of a nuclear or radiological weapon being used against New York City is also among the foremost concerns of Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly," said Richard Daddario, the New York City Police Department's deputy commissioner for counterterrorism.

He described the police department's Securing the Cities Program for using equipment and training personnel to respond to risks of a nuclear attack.

 
 
Jim Kouri, CPP, formerly Fifth Vice-President, is currently a Board Member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, an editor for ConservativeBase.com, and he's a columnist for Examiner.com.  In addition, he's a blogger for the Cheyenne, Wyoming Fox News Radio affiliate KGAB (www.kgab.com). Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. 

He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations.  He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.   Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer and columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.   Kouri appears regularly as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Fox News Channel, Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, etc.

Read more >>